RSS

Virtual Learning Environment: Frog

The presentation today at the ISTEC meeting was about FROG Virtual Learning Environment (VLE).  Andrew Duckworth, from Regents International School in Bangkok mentioned that in comparison to StudyWiz it seemed to be a better environment, due to it being more open-sourced, allowing of more plug-ins.

What is Frog?

  • An application development platform, with a learning platform built into it – (Scripting functionality)
  • Customized for each school
  • No programming involved.  All GUI
  • Primary and Secondary versions
  • Delivered on a server within the school – helps with performance
  • Accessible from home
  • Social networking modules are incorporated into the interface – Feeds
  • Uses SIMS
  • Allows SCORM content
  • Allows for differentiating using groups
  • Froglite – runs in the background monitors and manages documents used through Frog
  • Unpacks Zip files
  • Allows for permissions
  • Has an e-portfolio
  • Resources can be turned into widgets – like Netvibes, iGoogle
  • Markbook
  • Email System
  • Planner
  • Works with pre-existing CMS (Course Management System)
  • Allows access to proprietary programs through secure gateway (for example, students can use Adobe, Microsoft, Sims, etc. from home)
  • Computer control within system – switch internet on and off – no screen monitoring though
  • Staff notice system – implemented along with champions
  • Live, online collaborative documents – form, page-building, diary systems
  • Online detention system
  • Work-spaces (Groups) are available to be created and managed – allowing groups to collaborate
  • Skins (personalized) are available for users
  • Mac-style (personal) dashboard
  • Integration with Google Apps (Free for Education)
  • Parent portal – graphing tools, attendance, behavior, assessment
  • Language Character Sets available for database – front end support only in English
  • Apps work well in Firefox and are being developed for iPhones and iPads
  • Implementation take about 12-18 months
  1. 21,000-27,000 pounds initial cost (Servers included – Dell – 2 Terabyte/Mirrored Drive with backups)
  2. 5000-7000 recurring prices
  3. Financing available
  4. 700 student limit

Pretty cool all around.  However, it is expensive for some schools.

The old adage, “You get what you pay for” seems to ring true with this system!

 

Tags: , , ,

Esafety: Thoughts about it

Paul White led a discussion about e-safety with an idea of a 360° tool, found here at generationsafe.ikeepsafe.org.  It is a self-assessment tool that asks educators to see how effective they are implementing safety through the cyber-world.  Some other resources that were mentioned included:

Things to consider when creating content were in reference to pod-casting and video editing online.  No specific items were mentioned in conjunction with these ideas, but some things that come to mind would be to make sure that people, especially students remain anonymous.  Ways to do this, would be to use fictional names and places in podcasts, to not allow any names to accompany children’s images in video, as well as to ensure that no imagery gives away the location of said children.  For example, crests and logos on shirts, billboards in the background, etc.

Another idea brought up was to have a focus with an Anti-cyberbullying week. The UK has a week designated to this from November 21st – November 25th.  At the website bullying.uk they stated a study found these stats, “43.5% of respondents aged 11-16 had been bullied via social networks such as Facebook, Bebo, Myspace, Twitter. 51% felt that blocking the bully from further contact or communication was a vital tool and a further 68 % felt that being able to report the perpetrator’s bullying activities would be advantageous.”

A simple way to cut down on the bullying would be to involve parents.  For example, parents or teachers could teach kids how to PrntScreen the bullying taking place online.  The parents of the bullied child could take this PrntScreen as evidence to the bullies parents and engage in a suitable conversation to try to rectify the problem.

One question that seems to arise again and again is, “Do schools block or not block Facebook?  Why or why not?”  I am definitely on the side which says, “Do NOT block Facebook”, but rather teach about profile limiting, privacy settings, using and what abuse is.  As educational foundations I think it is our job to be aware of all environments our students will be, and educate them about these environments.  Blocking such sites will do them no good when they get into the real world.  That said, these are some of the things that we need to concern ourselves with:

Facebook has incorporated a report button for people.  This is the dialogue box that pops up when it is enabled:

The REPORT/BLOCK button allows for the options necessary to report this person as you can see in the picture above.

As a school administrator, you can educate a large population.  Create a fake account and befriend as many students as possible.  You will be surprised how many and how fast students unwittingly allow access to their online personal lives through befriending.  After many of the friends have been established, have an assembly or an unveiling of who you actually are.  Watch the astonishment around the room, but also watch shortly afterward the action that takes place by students to put up safeguards against such actions.  Many of them will possibly re-evaluate their whole friends list in order to weed through actual friends and those who they don’t actually know.

But don’t just consider the little ones.  Run a course called “Facebook for the over 40s”.  Most often the young kids and teenagers have a pretty good grasp at much of the technology that is out there.  It is the non “digital natives” who are taking a slower time to jump on this bandwagon.  Therefore it is often necessary to help them out in order for them to properly guide their sons and daughters.  A course designed for them is just the thing to jump-start that relationship.

On the subject of esafety a debate naturally arises between primary and secondary teachers.  “Who should be blocked? What should be blocked? Should anything be blocked?” are all good questions with opposing answers depending upon whose lens you wish to view the answer through.  As a school, different proxy settings need to be put into place to enable and disable certain viewers from content depending upon age range or maturity.  A neat esafety site for kids to play games and learn is found here.

Finally, as educators, don’t limit the scope of the student’s online social networking to Facebook, but introduce them to other free online tools for collaboration: Google Docs, Scribed, Google Scholar, and a whole slew of other ideas are out there.  A great resource for finding Online Collaboration Tools is found here, at MindMeister.

 
 

Tags: , , , ,

Basic Reading in Google Search – ISTEC final notes

At the ISTEC meeting we had the session that I usually enjoy the most.  It is a time when people come up and show a thing or two they find nifty.  It is usually the cutting edge stuff that no one has seen before.  For example:

Search for kids

  • Google – Advanced Search (basic reading age)

Go to Google – Advanced Search

Choose Reading Level:

Another great Kids Search example was:

Some of the latest resources mentioned are listed below:

  • dropitto.me – a dropbox add-in allows others to send files to your dropbox
  • edmodo –  an excellent, free (course management system) CMS for teachers and students
  • packrati.us – adds twitter feed URLs to your delicious account
  • calibre – e-books library management system
  • epubread – allows you to read ePubs in Firefox
  • posterous.com – fun ways to share and collaborate online

Concerning e-portfolios, these items were presented:

A noteworthy site to work in conjunction with those listed above:

  • topicmarks – summarizes text documents for you electronically
 

Tags: , , , , ,

Concept driven curriculum | Collaboration | Braingym

The professional development I attended today was about Concept Driven Curriculum, Collaboration and BrainGym in the PYP.  Some of the main points driven home from the first session were that:

  • Concepts and related concepts are the links between specialist subjects and core teachers.
  • Teachers should vocalize concepts, “We are learning about change.  How are you learning about change in another class?”
  • “Less is more” – Related concepts should be focused upon for in-depth learning, rather than a whole slew of concepts lightly touched upon.
  • Related Concepts should be embedded in the Central Idea
  • Lessons should be universal – transdisciplinary, over time, local and global
  • A good central idea is one that can be used in any grade.

The following session was a reflection about collaboration.

  • One new idea to me was that “Collaboration is not always a good thing.”  These ideas were adapted from Robbins, H., & Finley, M. (2000) They mentioned these pitfalls:
  1. Sameness – If teams are too collaborative they adopt rigid standards and impose them on themselves, not ready to think outside the box
  2. Groupthink leads to purges of perceived outsiders and stultification of insiders.
  3. Blurriness.  Too much democracy leads to mush and might lack focus.
  4. Slowness.  Concensus doesn’t “snap to” the way intimidated agreement does.
  5. Leaderlessness.  When everyone is encouraged to lead, the result is that no one does.
  6. Defencelessness. Some teams become so intimate and sensitive with one another they can’t function among outsiders.
  7. Interiority. Teams who work too long together have a way of becoming cross-eyed over time.
  8. Mercilessness.  “The many are stronger than the one” is the motto of supercollaboration, which is also the motto of fascism.
  • Don’t teach for knowledge, but what to do with that knowledge – to teach for understanding.  For example, don’t just teach about the French Revolution. Think about what you do with and through the knowledge.  For more about this concept up on read David Perkins
  • To find out who is a leader and who actually has better answers use the LOST AT SEA test.
  • Is there are difference between collaboration and cooperation?

Braingym was the final session that is a program of 26 movements to enhance learning and performance

  • Feed your body with water and oxygen
  • The human body was made to be used
  • Be Positive, Active, Clear & Energetic
  • Make connections between left and right hemispheres of the brain
  • Laterality, Centering, Focusing
  • Combine fine motor exercises, reflexology, yoga and fitness.
 
 

Tags: , ,